Thursday 28 June 2007

Are You Really That Poor ?

Given the recent media and political coverage on poverty I wanted to look at what being poor in the UK actually means. I just didn’t buy the story that there are that many poor people in the UK. OK so the bottom 10% of the population may struggle to live the full western lifestyle but when I look around me the only truly poor people in the UK seem to be those who have been victims of extraordinarilly unlucky circumstances as a result of crime, location or health.

Initial research started with government figures showing the poor are classed as those on less than 60% of the national average wage

  • Average UK wage is about £23k
  • Average UK household income is £35k (at 1.5 persons per household)

60% of these numbers are £14k and £15k per capita respectively. So assuming an average income of below £15k per capita means you are officially classified as being poor. That isn’t a bad income at all and surely it’s not really poor… or is it?

We Need Better Stuff Not More Stuff
Given that western lifestyle and success revolves around status and possession of assets, another thing that keeps bugging me is that of quantifying wealth factors that make you feel more or less happy. I feel this fall under two banners:

  • For the Wealthy
    • More money brings little further happiness
    • Companionship and altruism bring a great deal more happiness
  • For the Poor
    • More money brings a great deal more happiness
    • Companionship brings little further happiness

So what does this mean? Maybe it means that we would like better stuff not simply more stuff. So what “Better Stuff” do we need? Are these things always material? For both rich and poor more money nearly always brings greater status. I have read that higher status in society leads to longevity and this is an important topic for another discussion. And more complex, does status influence happiness as well as make a claim on longer life.

The Happiness Threshold
I then started to look for the threshold where more wealth brings little further gain in happiness. Some would say there is no ceiling. Research found the following.

The Observer happiness threshold is around £25k. Another source puts the happiness threshold at £10k (needs reference). The UK National Minimum Wage is around £11k. And Alter.Net March 23 07 claims “money consistently buys happiness up to $10k income per capita. So the consensus on a happiness threshold (excluding the Observer) is lower than the UK poverty threshold qnd about the same as the UK national minimum wage. Interestingly therefore the UK government seems to be saying you can be poor and still be happy.

UK Poverty Compared to the Developing World
So how does UK poverty compare to the poorest in the developing world. Well 3rd world poverty, classified generally at less than $1 per day, or about £0.54 per day and £200 per year. This amounts to just 2% or 1/50th of the UK National Minimum Wage! Now you could say we have found some really poor people and we are converging on my point. Therefore even the “happy” UK poor are “wealthy” on a global per capita basis. No wonder they are “happy” when they are earning 50 times what real poor are earning. You could argue that the developing world needs much less cash to keep the lights on but they often don’t have lights anyway. Finally on this, in 1820 an American family lived on $1500 per year in current money, close to current averages in Africa. Ref Alternet Mar 22 07. A sobering thought.

A Place of Your Own
Another whinge factor in the UK lately is the access to a mortgage for our “poor” hard done by population. People are claiming it’s so hard for people to get on the property ladder today. And the biggest moaners do not seem to come from poor backgrounds here, most of them are middle class. But I know people who had trouble 25 years ago and did not complain as much. One example earned less than her mortgage and had to borrow from her Mum to keep the payments going and this was not considered abnormal at the time apparently. Recently I read someone complaining they only had about 20% of their earnings left over after essential expenses. Only 20% left to spend on "stuff" poor things! Is it the deposit or the interest/payments they mean are impossible? Or is it most people get peeved if they don’t have enough disposable income after house, food and transport has been covered to spend on stuff to maintain a decent level of status anxiety. This is the nature of our society I guess. How will this look to future generations.

Realtive Jealousy
I think this delta between minimum wage and average wage is what the Lib Dem politicians have been claiming is “Relative” poverty. The level below which social unrest commences due to… what exactly? Jealousy? Real poverty has been confused by this political agenda and is known as “Absolute” poverty as in 3rd world or significantly bleow minimum wage here in the UK. As a result of all this data I decided to personally undertake a short experiment to see what it felt like to live on minimum wage of about £970 per month. I did this for 6 months and found it straight forward and easy. The only downsides were some definite discrimination, folks looking down their noses at my obviously poor lifestyle and missing out on most of modern society’s luxuries. Most surprising was how embarrassed (or jealous) it made me feel about those so openly displaying their wealth via typical badges of status. They seemed rather insecure individuals all of a sudden.

Its Not About Being Poor Then
As a UK citizen, I temporarily conclude that living on 11k is not living as a poor person at all. It just means you get fewer luxuries and need to deal with some rather arrogant human behaviour from time to time. And maybe we treat those with relative poverty as second class citizens, unofficially of course. Essentially this means the worse off are being discriminated against, its “poorism” in other words. These folks may then get caught in a viscous cycle of criminalisation to boot.

We Live Like Kings
Something I intend writing about at another time is on the wealthy who often claim they have made success through merit alone. I don’t believe it’s that simple and much success is pure luck though heritage and genetics even today. Some of us are born with higher IQ potential than others, thats not skill, its luck and those lucky enough could use some magnanimity. Even if you are unfortunate enought to lose your job you will still live the life of a king relative to the majority in sub sahara. Think about it!

So our politicians need to think a little more carefully about poverty and what it means… and in the mean time make sure those in the 3rd world don’t hear us talking until we have a more selfless story to tell.

Wednesday 27 June 2007

Too Busy ?

How often have you heard this lately:

“I’d love to help out but I’m Too Busy right now”

Yeah right! But everybody seems to be saying this these days. And their net output does not seem to have increased. And they don’t seem to be experiencing a proportional level of achievement from it. So what does this oft heard statement actually mean?

How busy are you really then? You are probably experiencing a mix of the following:

  1. Doing things useful to society
  2. Doing things useful to yourself
  3. Doing things that are neither 1 or 2 above

Given output is not incrementing exponentially it would seem the latter statement forms the vast majority of this “busyness”. And we’re burning a heck of a lot of fossil fuels doing it. About 95% of the stuff we do and buy has a carbon footprint. If most of it is used within idling activities, what does this say about our society and what impact does it have on our quality of life as individuals.

Here are some of the nastier culprits depleting our quality of life:

Laptop Leisure

  • Taking laptop to bed with you
  • Watching TV while “finishing” the days work
  • Sunday night binge – preparing for tomorrow morning
  • Answering work calls on holiday. Don’t you think the world will continue without you

The Email Plague - “I have a 1000 emails to do since the weekend”

  • Why? What makes them so important
  • They are all imporatant ergo, none of them are
  • None are important, so they are all SPAM
  • Somewhere in between, so you wasted a lot of time figuring that out
  • Forgotten how to talk to people? If they are really important , go see them, pick up the phone

At Work Politics

  • Competition for pay rises and even keeping your job
  • AKA back protection or Vertical Teamwork
  • Much time is spent being seen to do the right thing
  • Brown Nosing the boss
  • Maximise time spent travelling to meetings that don’t need you

Status Anxiety or Pseudo Quality of Life

  • Lots of time spent earning more money to buy more stuff to throw away
  • Throwing away gives you status among peers
  • The race to keep up with the latest gadgets, trends, fashions
  • Cattle Class Holidays as far away as possible. Why suffer? It’s a holiday isn’t it

So what is the resulting behaviour? People will do the things that are most likely to keep them in their job and make them feel like they have achieved something (even if they have not) And also things that will make them look better than their peers and even pay lip service to Quality of Life factors.

Where does this leave us. Quality of Life and a selfless pursuit of a better society are secondary to most individuals. See Tragedy of the Commons for more on this. The challenge of raising individuals’ consciousness to the needs of future society is difficult. We don’t seem to care about other people enough essentially...or are denying it is a problem because its so difficult and uncomfortable to think about.

How can this consciousness be raised and what’s in it for the individual. And will it need a very hard landing to trigger a change. Such as the climate is threatening to do.

Climate. Who’s Fault is it Anyway

The world is in deadlock on dealing with carbon emissions. The developing world see’s the developed as being responsible. The developed world see’s the fast growing developing world as the future culprits. Stale mate! No one trusts the other. No one sees any leaders.

So how has this come about. In the developed world, own responsibility has been a historic and continued high carbon growth causing the climate problem. The mitigation roadblock is that there is no foreseeable low carbon pathway planned. People are too busy having a nice time to worry about future generations and thus deny there is a problem. In the developing world own responsibility comes from historic cultural, religious, political and economic failures being the cause of poverty and a chance low carbon footprint. The mitigation roadblock for them is a desire for economic growth and poverty alleviation.

So how do you break the Deadlock. Would the south accept slower growth if the north delivered a viable low carbon pathway? And visa versa. Both would be converging activities, ultimately to the benefit of all. For the 1st time in history, this needs “everyone” to start Talking, Trusting, Risking.

Actions that could be considered are: What political action would this require; What economic system needs developing; What technology would be adopted

This is no longer about blame. Its about action from real leaders.

Tuesday 26 June 2007

Globalised Mitigation Program

Look here for a rather old idea from a few years back on my first thoughts the problem and some ideas on how to deal with it. Essentialy it asks for a "global response" on dealing with the climate as the only way to succeed
/gmp.pdf

Looking for new thinkers

We are looking for people to share ideas around this blog. Why not drop in and leave a comment about something you think needs discussing. Try to make it something new